Markets
Raydium buybacks top $4 million in 30 days
Raydium's Oct. 9 card puts RAY buybacks above $4 million over the last 30 days, and it does not say the tokens were burned.

Raydium said on October 9, 2026, that buybacks of its token have totaled more than $4 million over the last 30 days. The post names the mint, 4k3Dyjzvzp8eMZWUXbBCjEvwSkkk59S5iCNLY3QrkX6R, and the card on the post reads "$4M+ RAY buybacks" with a Last 30D tag. The post is here:
A buyback is a purchase of the project's own token. Dollars go out. Tokens come in. Raydium's post uses that word and a dollar total. It does not say the tokens were burned, sent to a dead address, or locked. Treating the word buyback as removed from supply adds a step the card does not show. The card shows the buying.
The mint is the token's address on Solana. The post writes it with a solana: prefix, which is how a client attaches an address to a sentence. The graphic then names the ticker that address belongs to: RAY. A reader checking the figure can start from the address rather than from the word on the card. The address and the ticker are the same announcement.
The number is a floor. Over $4 million in the text, and $4M+ on the card, both mean the 30-day total cleared $4 million. They do not mean the total was $4 million on the nose, and they do not publish the amount above the line. There is no token count, no average price, and no list of the individual purchases. Thirty days is the window. October 9 is the day that window was posted. The text and the graphic agree: both put the floor at $4 million and the window at 30 days, and neither prints a second figure beside it.
Raydium's account describes itself as Solana's liquidity layer for trading, token launches, and onchain markets. The buyback note sits on that account. The profile also marks the feed NFA, the account's own way of saying a post is not a recommendation. A buyback total is a treasury fact from the last 30 days. It is not a forecast of the next price, and the account did not write one.
What the post leaves off is as plain as what it includes. No wallet is named as the buyer. No share of trading fees is given as the source of the dollars. No comparison with the prior 30 days is on the card. A desk that wants those three facts has to wait for a longer note, or read the purchases off the mint. This post is the total, the ticker, the window, and the date.
The chain under the mint is the same one that just cut its slot time. Solana's move to 200 millisecond slots is a network fact, dated to an epoch boundary, and it is not a reason these buybacks happened. The two notes belong on the same desk because both are Solana. They should not be folded into one claim. That story is here: https://cryptokeymedia.com/news/solana-200ms-slots
What comes next is the next 30-day total. This card says the buybacks cleared $4 million in the window posted on October 9. The follow-up is another card, or a mint that shows the purchases, with a figure that can sit next to this one. Until then the number on the record is the one Raydium printed: more than $4 million of RAY, last 30 days.
